SEC Charges Former Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Executives with Securities Fraud; Release No. 2011-267; December 16, 2011
The SEC charged six former Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac executives with securities fraud for concealing tens of billions in high-risk subprime and Alt-A loans, misleading investors about their true exposure, and now faces penalties, disgorgement, and director bars as both companies cooperated under non-prosecution agreements.
The SEC charged three former Fannie Mae executives—Daniel Mudd, Enrico Dallavecchia, and Thomas Lund—and three former Freddie Mac executives—Richard Syron, Patricia Cook, and Donald Bisenius—with securities fraud for knowingly misrepresenting their institutions' exposure to subprime and Alt-A mortgages. Fannie Mae understated its subprime exposure by over $43 billion by excluding Expanded Approval loans and misrepresented Alt-A exposure as 11% when it was actually 18% in 2007; Freddie Mac falsely claimed 'basically no subprime exposure' despite holding $141 billion in subprime-like loans by end-2006, rising to $244 billion by mid-2008. The SEC is seeking financial penalties, disgorgement with interest, permanent injunctions, and officer/director bars, while both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac entered non-prosecution agreements, accepting responsibility and agreeing to cooperate without admitting or denying liability.
The SEC charged six former top executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with securities fraud for deliberately misleading investors about the true extent of their exposure to high-risk subprime and Alt-A mortgage loans during the lead-up to the 2008 financial crisis. Fannie Mae executives Daniel Mudd, Enrico Dallavecchia, and Thomas Lund concealed over $43 billion in Expanded Approval loans by excluding them from subprime disclosures, falsely reporting subprime exposure at just 0.2% ($4.8 billion) in 2006, while also misstating Alt-A exposure as 11% in March 2007 when it was actually 18%. Freddie Mac executives Richard Syron, Patricia Cook, and Donald Bisenius publicly claimed the company had 'basically no subprime exposure,' despite holding $141 billion in subprime-like loans by December 2006, which grew to $244 billion by June 2008. These misrepresentations occurred between 2006 and 2008 in regulatory filings, investor calls, and media interviews, as both institutions sought to expand market share while masking risk. Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac entered into Non-Prosecution Agreements with the SEC, accepting responsibility for their conduct and agreeing to fully cooperate with the enforcement actions against the individuals, though neither admitted nor denied liability. The SEC is seeking financial penalties, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with interest, permanent injunctive relief, and bars preventing the executives from serving as officers or directors of public companies. The enforcement action underscores the SEC’s focus on holding senior executives accountable for material misstatements during a period of systemic financial instability.
Exhibits & Attached Documents (6)
- complaint SEC v. RICHARD F. SYRON
- complaint Plaintiff, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") for
- pdf 2011 267 Chart Alt A
- pdf 2011 267 Chart Subprime Exposure
- pdf "Division") of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") into
- pdf "Division") of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") into
Extracted insights
- $244.00B $244 billion ≥$1B
- $141.00B $141 billion ≥$1B
- $43.00B $43 billion ≥$1B
- $4.80B $4.8 billion ≥$1B
- person daniel h. mudd
- person donald j. bisenius
- person enrico dallavecchia
- person fannie mae
- person fannie mae executives
- person freddie mac
- person freddie mac executives
- person patricia l. cook
- person richard f. syron
- person robert khuzami
- agency sec enforcement division
- agency Securities and Exchange Commission
- scheme_term six former executives of fannie mae and freddie mac with securities fraud
- SEC charged Six Former Executives Of Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac With Securities Fraud
- Daniel H. Mudd was former CEO of Fannie Mae
- Enrico Dallavecchia was former Chief Risk Officer of Fannie Mae
- Thomas A. Lund was former Executive Vice President of Fannie Mae's Single Family Mortgage Business
- Richard F. Syron was former Chairman and CEO of Freddie Mac
- Patricia L. Cook was former Executive Vice President and Chief Business Officer of Freddie Mac
- Donald J. Bisenius was former Executive Vice President for Freddie Mac's Single Family Guarantee Business
- Fannie Mae Executives made misleading statements regarding Subprime And Alt-A Mortgage Loan Holdings Between December 2006 And August 2008
- Freddie Mac Executives made misleading statements regarding Subprime Mortgage Loan Holdings Between March 2007 And August 2008
- Fannie Mae entered into Non-Prosecution Agreement with SEC
- Freddie Mac entered into Non-Prosecution Agreement with SEC
- SEC is seeking Financial Penalties, Disgorgement, Injunctive Relief, And Officer And Director Bars
- Robert Khuzami is Director of SEC Enforcement Division
- Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac Executives misrepresented Subprime Loan Exposure To Investors
SEC CHARGES FORMER FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC EXECUTIVES WITH SECURITIES FRAUD Chart for Alt-A Exposure: Misleading Statements Chart for Subprime Exposure: Misleading Statements Companies Agree to Cooperate in SEC Actions FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 2011-267 Washington, D.C., Dec. 16, 2011 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged six former top executives of the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) with securities fraud, alleging they knew and approved of misleading statements claiming the companies had minimal holdings of higher-risk mortgage loans, including subprime loans. Additional Materials SEC complaint vs. Freddie Mac executives SEC complaint vs. Fannie Mae executives Non-Prosecution Agreement - Freddie Mac Non-Prosecution Agreement - Fannie Mae Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Commission in which each company agreed to accept responsibility for its conduct and not dispute, contest, or contradict the contents of an agreed-upon Statement of Facts without admitting nor denying liability. Each also agreed to cooperate with the Commission's litigation against the former executives. In entering into these Agreements, the Commission considered the unique circumstances presented by the companies' current status, including the financial support provided to the companies by the U.S. Treasury, the role of the Federal Housing Finance Agency as conservator of each company, and the costs that may be imposed on U.S. taxpayers. Three former Fannie Mae executives — former Chief Executive Officer Daniel H. Mudd, former Chief Risk Officer Enrico Dallavecchia, and former Executive Vice President of Fannie Mae's Single Family Mortgage business, Thomas A. Lund — were named in the SEC's complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The SEC also charged three former Freddie Mac executives — former Chairman of the Board and CEO Richard F. Syron, former Executive Vice President and Chief Business Officer Patricia L. Cook, and former Executive Vice President for the Single Family Guarantee business Donald J. Bisenius — in a separate complaint filed in the same court. "Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac executives told the world that their subprime exposure was substantially smaller than it really was," said Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC's Enforcement Division. "These material misstatements occurred during a time of acute investor interest in financial institutions' exposure to subprime loans, and misled the market about the amount of risk on the company's books. All individuals, regardless of their rank or position, will be held accountable for perpetuating half-truths or misrepresentations about matters materially important to the interest of our country's investors." The SEC is seeking financial penalties, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with interest, permanent injunctive relief and officer and director bars against Mudd, Dallavecchia, Lund, Syron, Cook, and Bisenius. Both lawsuits allege that the former executives caused the federal mortgage firms to materially misstate their holdings of subprime mortgage loans in periodic and other filings with the Commission, public statements, investor calls, and media interviews. The suit involving the Fannie Mae executives also includes similar allegations regarding Alt-A mortgage loans. The suit against the former Fannie Mae executives alleges they made misleading statements — or aided and abetted others — between December 2006 and August 2008. The former Freddie Mac executives are alleged to have made misleading statements — or aided and abetted others - between March 2007 and August 2008. The SEC's complaint against the former Fannie Mae executives alleges that, when Fannie Mae began reporting its exposure to subprime loans in 2007, it broadly described the loans as those "made to borrowers with weaker credit histories," and then reported — with the knowledge, support, and approval of Mudd, Dallavecchia, and Lund — less than one-tenth of its loans that met that description. Fannie Mae reported that its 2006 year-end Single Family exposure to subprime loans was just 0.2 percent, or approximately $4.8 billion, of its Single Family loan portfolio. Investors were not told that in calculating the Company's reported exposure to subprime loans, Fannie Mae did not include loan products specifically targeted by Fannie Mae towards borrowers with weaker credit histories, including more than $43 billion of Expanded Approval, or "EA" loans. Fannie Mae's executives also knew and approved of the decision to underreport Fannie Mae's Alt-A loan exposure, the SEC alleged. Fannie Mae disclosed that its March 31, 2007 exposure to Alt-A loans was 11 percent of its portfolio of Single Family loans. In reality, Fannie Mae's Alt-A exposure at that time was approximately 18 percent of its Single Family loan holdings. The misleading disclosures were made as Fannie Mae's executives were seeking to increase the Company's market share through increased purchases of subprime and Alt-A loans, and gave false comfort to investors about the extent of Fannie Mae's exposure to high-risk loans, the SEC alleged. In the complaint against the former Freddie Mac executives, the SEC alleged that they and Freddie Mac led investors to believe that the firm used a broad definition of subprime loans and was disclosing all of its Single-Family subprime loan exposure. Syron and Cook reinforced the misleading perception when they each publicly proclaimed that the Single Family business had "basically no subprime exposure." Unbeknown to investors, as of December 31, 2006, Freddie Mac's Single Family business was exposed to approximately $141 billion of loans internally referred to as "subprime" or "subprime like," accounting for 10 percent of the portfolio, and grew to approximately $244 billion, or 14 percent of the portfolio, as of June 30, 2008. The SEC's complaint alleges that Mudd violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Rules 10b-5(b) and 13(a)14(a) thereunder, and Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"); and that Mudd aided and abetted Fannie Mae's violations of Sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5(b), 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder. The SEC complaint also alleges that Dallavecchia violated Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and aided and abetted Fannie Mae's violations of Sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5(b), 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder. Finally, the SEC complaint alleges that Lund aided and abetted Fannie Mae's violations of Sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5(b), 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder. The SEC's complaint alleges that Syron and Cook violated Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5(b) thereunder and Securities Act Section 17(a)(2); that Syron violated Exchange Act Rule 13a-14; and that Syron, Cook and Bisenius aided and abetted violations of Sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5(b), 12b-20 and 13a-13 thereunder. The SEC's investigation of Fannie Mae was conducted by Senior Attorneys Natasha S. Guinan, Christina M. Marshall, Liban Jama, Mona L. Benach, and Associate Chief Accountant, Peter Rosario, under the supervision of Assistant Director Charles E. Cain, and Associate Director Stephen L. Cohen. Sarah Levine and James Kidney will lead the SEC's litigation efforts. The SEC's investigation of Freddie Mac was conducted by Senior Attorneys Giles T. Cohen and David S. Karp and Assistant Chief Accountant Avron Elbaum of the SEC's Division of Enforcement under the supervision of Assistant Director Charles E. Cain and Associate Director Stephen L. Cohen. Kevin O'Rourke and Suzanne Romajas will lead the SEC's litigation efforts. # # # For more information about these enforcement actions, contact: Robert S. Khuzami, Director (202) 551-4894 Lorin L. Reisner, Deputy Director (202) 551-4781 Stephen L. Cohen, Associate Director (202) 551-4472 Charles E. Cain, Assistant Director (202) 551-4911 http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2011/2011-267.htm Home | Previous Page Modified: 12/16/2011
SEC CHARGES FORMER FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC EXECUTIVES WITH SECURITIES FRAUD Chart for Alt-A Exposure: Misleading Statements Chart for Subprime Exposure: Misleading Statements Companies Agree to Cooperate in SEC Actions FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 2011-267 Washington, D.C., Dec. 16, 2011 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged six former top executives of the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) with securities fraud, alleging they knew and approved of misleading statements claiming the companies had minimal holdings of higher-risk mortgage loans, including subprime loans. Additional Materials SEC complaint vs. Freddie Mac executives SEC complaint vs. Fannie Mae executives Non-Prosecution Agreement - Freddie Mac Non-Prosecution Agreement - Fannie Mae Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Commission in which each company agreed to accept responsibility for its conduct and not dispute, contest, or contradict the contents of an agreed-upon Statement of Facts without admitting nor denying liability. Each also agreed to cooperate with the Commission's litigation against the former executives. In entering into these Agreements, the Commission considered the unique circumstances presented by the companies' current status, including the financial support provided to the companies by the U.S. Treasury, the role of the Federal Housing Finance Agency as conservator of each company, and the costs that may be imposed on U.S. taxpayers. Three former Fannie Mae executives — former Chief Executive Officer Daniel H. Mudd, former Chief Risk Officer Enrico Dallavecchia, and former Executive Vice President of Fannie Mae's Single Family Mortgage business, Thomas A. Lund — were named in the SEC's complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The SEC also charged three former Freddie Mac executives — former Chairman of the Board and CEO Richard F. Syron, former Executive Vice President and Chief Business Officer Patricia L. Cook, and former Executive Vice President for the Single Family Guarantee business Donald J. Bisenius — in a separate complaint filed in the same court. "Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac executives told the world that their subprime exposure was substantially smaller than it really was," said Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC's Enforcement Division. "These material misstatements occurred during a time of acute investor interest in financial institutions' exposure to subprime loans, and misled the market about the amount of risk on the company's books. All individuals, regardless of their rank or position, will be held accountable for perpetuating half-truths or misrepresentations about matters materially important to the interest of our country's investors." The SEC is seeking financial penalties, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with interest, permanent injunctive relief and officer and director bars against Mudd, Dallavecchia, Lund, Syron, Cook, and Bisenius. Both lawsuits allege that the former executives caused the federal mortgage firms to materially misstate their holdings of subprime mortgage loans in periodic and other filings with the Commission, public statements, investor calls, and media interviews. The suit involving the Fannie Mae executives also includes similar allegations regarding Alt-A mortgage loans. The suit against the former Fannie Mae executives alleges they made misleading statements — or aided and abetted others — between December 2006 and August 2008. The former Freddie Mac executives are alleged to have made misleading statements — or aided and abetted others - between March 2007 and August 2008. The SEC's complaint against the former Fannie Mae executives alleges that, when Fannie Mae began reporting its exposure to subprime loans in 2007, it broadly described the loans as those "made to borrowers with weaker credit histories," and then reported — with the knowledge, support, and approval of Mudd, Dallavecchia, and Lund — less than one-tenth of its loans that met that description. Fannie Mae reported that its 2006 year-end Single Family exposure to subprime loans was just 0.2 percent, or approximately $4.8 billion, of its Single Family loan portfolio. Investors were not told that in calculating the Company's reported exposure to subprime loans, Fannie Mae did not include loan products specifically targeted by Fannie Mae towards borrowers with weaker credit histories, including more than $43 billion of Expanded Approval, or "EA" loans. Fannie Mae's executives also knew and approved of the decision to underreport Fannie Mae's Alt-A loan exposure, the SEC alleged. Fannie Mae disclosed that its March 31, 2007 exposure to Alt-A loans was 11 percent of its portfolio of Single Family loans. In reality, Fannie Mae's Alt-A exposure at that time was approximately 18 percent of its Single Family loan holdings. The misleading disclosures were made as Fannie Mae's executives were seeking to increase the Company's market share through increased purchases of subprime and Alt-A loans, and gave false comfort to investors about the extent of Fannie Mae's exposure to high-risk loans, the SEC alleged. In the complaint against the former Freddie Mac executives, the SEC alleged that they and Freddie Mac led investors to believe that the firm used a broad definition of subprime loans and was disclosing all of its Single-Family subprime loan exposure. Syron and Cook reinforced the misleading perception when they each publicly proclaimed that the Single Family business had "basically no subprime exposure." Unbeknown to investors, as of December 31, 2006, Freddie Mac's Single Family business was exposed to approximately $141 billion of loans internally referred to as "subprime" or "subprime like," accounting for 10 percent of the portfolio, and grew to approximately $244 billion, or 14 percent of the portfolio, as of June 30, 2008. The SEC's complaint alleges that Mudd violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Rules 10b-5(b) and 13(a)14(a) thereunder, and Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"); and that Mudd aided and abetted Fannie Mae's violations of Sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5(b), 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder. The SEC complaint also alleges that Dallavecchia violated Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and aided and abetted Fannie Mae's violations of Sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5(b), 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder. Finally, the SEC complaint alleges that Lund aided and abetted Fannie Mae's violations of Sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5(b), 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13 thereunder. The SEC's complaint alleges that Syron and Cook violated Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5(b) thereunder and Securities Act Section 17(a)(2); that Syron violated Exchange Act Rule 13a-14; and that Syron, Cook and Bisenius aided and abetted violations of Sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5(b), 12b-20 and 13a-13 thereunder. The SEC's investigation of Fannie Mae was conducted by Senior Attorneys Natasha S. Guinan, Christina M. Marshall, Liban Jama, Mona L. Benach, and Associate Chief Accountant, Peter Rosario, under the supervision of Assistant Director Charles E. Cain, and Associate Director Stephen L. Cohen. Sarah Levine and James Kidney will lead the SEC's litigation efforts. The SEC's investigation of Freddie Mac was conducted by Senior Attorneys Giles T. Cohen and David S. Karp and Assistant Chief Accountant Avron Elbaum of the SEC's Division of Enforcement under the supervision of Assistant Director Charles E. Cain and Associate Director Stephen L. Cohen. Kevin O'Rourke and Suzanne Romajas will lead the SEC's litigation efforts. # # # For more information about these enforcement actions, contact: Robert S. Khuzami, Director (202) 551-4894 Lorin L. Reisner, Deputy Director (202) 551-4781 Stephen L. Cohen, Associate Director (202) 551-4472 Charles E. Cain, Assistant Director (202) 551-4911 http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2011/2011-267.htm Home | Previous Page Modified: 12/16/2011